|
|
previous topic :: next topic |
Author |
Message |
G-dog
Since 04 Jan 2007
61 Posts
Portland
|
Tue Jun 12, 07 1:10 pm |
|
|
Quote: | Deleterious Materials: The following conditions relating to control of hazardous, toxic and waste materials shall be observed:
a. Treated Wood: Ineligibility- Projects which propose installation of chemically treated wood that will contact surface or ground water or that will be placed over water where it will be exposed to abrasion require individual, site specific review and are, therefore, not certified by this 401 WQC.
b. Projects that require removal of chemically treated wood must: |
I know nobody wants to read about this, but hey, it's fun for me. I talked to one of my contacts at DEQ and here's what he had to say:
the Federal Clean Water Act (Section 401) regulates placement of chemically treated wood in or over waters of the state (including
wetlands) when a removal/fill permit (Section 404 CWA) or navigable waterway (Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act) permit is required.
Typically, use of chemically treated wood in or over water is discouraged. Recommended alternatives (Nontoxic Alternatives:
Concrete or steel piles. Whenever lumber, wood, or other wood products will be used below ordinary high water, or as part of an in-water or over-water structure, and must be treated to assure effective performance against decay or other wood destroying organisms, the applicant should consider using regular lumber that has been (1) permanently sealed using a water-based silica product (e.g., Internal Wood Stabilizer, manufactured by Timber Pro UV in Portland, Oregon), or
(2) temporarily sealed using a nontoxic water repellant and wood sealer (e.g., SoyGuard Premium Water Repellent and Wood Sealer, manufactured by SoyClean in Brooklyn, Iowa). Similarly, recycled lumber should be considered for uses that do not require stress-graded products (e.g., Maxituf plastic lumber, manufactured by Resco Plastics in Coos Bay, Oregon - no sealing or maintenance required during the 50-year warranty period). or using WWPA "Certified" products and coating them with a non-toxic, water resistant sealant which must be maintained for the life of the structure (ok for overwater structures, not so good for immersed components), and providing abrasion protection (mattin, padding, floats, etc.).
The gist is that chemical components leach into water (particularly of concern are copper, zinc, arsenic, etc. which are the typical components to treat western wood species, and also PAHs from good old creosote) for months after initial placement and then again with each new exposure from abrasion, etc. |
|
|
registered
Since 12 Jul 2005
1319 Posts
tsunami
Sandbagger
|
Tue Jun 12, 07 6:11 pm |
|
|
IT HASN'T HIT THE WATER YET AND ITS GETTING RAINED ON HERE ON THE FORUM. I would dump it at night and claim no responsibility. You never know it may float away
permits with the treated lumber may be a issue for sure. rediculous.
I would keep my C.C.B # out of any construction pics. last thing any one needs a claim against or anything. Defacing those poor salmon's habitat.
Damn that debris that floated down the river sure seems like it could make a good slider. way to recycle you guys. |
|
|
tekko
Since 20 Feb 2006
376 Posts
White Salmon
Liquid Force
|
Tue Jun 12, 07 7:48 pm |
|
|
Sounds like if the PT lumber is sealed, it can be used? Did I miss something? Also, this thing floats... so the wood would actually be above the waterline.
I say seal it with approved method, treat it as recreational watersports gear. Ie-
-Stand up paddle barge- you know for cross training. Or put a mastrack in between the trex and make it a lightwind windsurfer.
or put a sail on it and register it as a homemade saliboat... have seen those moored at the sandbar in the summer.
Many options.
With all the shit in the river from barges, trains, boats, cars, trucks, tourists, fisherman,q kiteboarders, etc, etc, I don't think this is really bad for the water on the grand scale... and I think all involved are willing to do whatever it right to make it as environmental as possible. _________________ Liquid Force Kiteboarding in the Pacific Northwest.
Demo's always available to those on this forum.. PM me to schedule. |
|
|
Pepi
Since 16 Jun 2006
1831 Posts
Pure Stoke Sports
Shop Owner
CGKA Member
|
Tue Jun 12, 07 10:56 pm |
|
|
As previously mentioned in another thread.
The permit will be a necessary fact of life.
Sherrif Mike did raise the question at 2 seperate Sandbar meetings regarding manmade craft located on the Columbia River or on the sandbar vicinity. He stated that as long as the manmade craft possessed a valid permit issued from the DSL(Dept of State Lands) he would leave them alone, but if it did not have a valid permit from DSL, he will be forced to remove it as soon as possible.
When asked about the kicker that was left last year, he commented that he let it slide temporarily (and even saved it from floating away once), but this year he would not be able to overlook any similar situations. As a result of all the hype around the Sandbar he likely was going to have to be extra cautious about any similar floating craft.
We've been given fair notice of the requirements needed to make it legit and also of the actions that the sheriff has to take if proper legal actions are not taken.
I'm not trying to rain on the parade, just trying to make sure that whomever has financially and physically invested in this project does not see it get removed and destroyed without any fighting chance.
Pepi _________________ Pure Stoke Sports
Hood River, OR
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hood-River-OR/2nd-Wind-Sports/35891485558?ref=mf
www.Purestokesports.com |
|
|
shredjim
Since 07 Jun 2006
186 Posts
Stoked
|
Tue Jun 12, 07 11:38 pm |
|
|
I was at the meeting where our cool sheriff Mike said the things Pepi posted. He is very supportive of productive kiteboarding activities, but he has to do his job. Talk to Mike or get the permit from DSL, they are friendly reasonable people. I just got the next "right of entry" permit from DSL in the mail today for our June 23rd sandbar cleanup. PM me if you guys need help getting the approvals/permits. |
|
|
TWIN-FIN
Since 24 May 2006
805 Posts
Portland, OR
Hot Monkey
|
Wed Jun 13, 07 10:32 am |
|
|
I think the simple way to get around the treated wood issue would be to remove any treated wood (rails/supports) and replace them with an alternative/composite material such as Trex.
(According to the manufacturer, Trex is made primarily from hardwood sawdust and recycled polyethylene plastic grocery sacks and plastic wrap.
Engineered lumber products have developed rapidly over the past few decades to the point that, in some ways, they are superior to wood. Engineered lumber is more moisture resistant and thus more stable. It expands and contracts less with changes in humidity and temperature and does not warp or twist).
When we went to the OBX last year I noticed that Real was using this type of material on thier sliders and water side decking. It totally makes sense, no harm to the enviroment and wont degrade, warp, splinter, and its a plastic base material (i.e. better as a slider).
If you launch the slider with the treated wood, its just a matter of time before "The Man" confiscates it. Why not do it right the first time and avoid all of the bull sh#@ that would follow with a deck that does not comply with state regs? |
|
|
forrest
Since 21 Jun 2005
4329 Posts
Hood River
Hick
CGKA Member
|
Wed Jun 13, 07 10:50 am |
|
|
It will have Trex as the sliding surface. I read it the same way as Tekko. We can just seal the wood.
BTW, it's not a slider it's a stage for performance arts and photography. |
|
|
Inept_Fun
Since 14 Apr 2005
1417 Posts
Hood River
XTreme Poster
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 9:32 am |
|
|
yeah good idea we will just take the thing apart and spend even more money to rebuild it with recycled material. In my opinion you all need to stop worrying about this and let the people putting all the time, and effort into building it, worry about it. You telling us that we cant get a permit because of treated wood really doesnt do sh*** for us. So unless one of you wants to help us try and get a permit, you should just close your mouths, unless asked to open them. _________________ I heart dangling |
|
|
forrest
Since 21 Jun 2005
4329 Posts
Hood River
Hick
CGKA Member
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 9:41 am |
|
|
Wow, dude, calm down! Jim just said to PM him for help. |
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 10:00 am |
|
|
PLACE THE CORDLESS DRILL ON THE GROUND AND BACK AWAY SLOWLY!!
We are not trying to piss on your parade or discourage you from putting a slider in the river. I would love to see a slider or cool kicker down there.
BUT, you must understand that this issue is a little bit bigger than the wants and needs of your friends and it is exactly why there are soo many rules about what can and can't be done in the river. I mean, what do you think the river would look like if everyone and anyone could build, place, drop or tie off anything they pleased in the water?? It would look like the beverly hillbillies is what it would look like.
You need permits for this kind of thing because it has the potential to do damage to the environment. I'm sorry that the fact that treated wood is hella toxic "doesn't do shit for you". If you think for a second that DEQ and all the other stakeholders took the time to write, review, and establish restrictions on treated wood just for the hell of it, your way way wrong.
I'm sorry that it is such a difficult process, I really am. the law wasn't written to regulate "sliders" but rather industrial, commercial, and substantial private projects. Everyone wants the salmon to come back and the rivers to be clean...until it effects them. |
|
|
stringy
Since 23 Jun 2006
1726 Posts
vancouver
XTreme Poster
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 10:07 am |
|
|
Inept_Fun wrote: | yeah good idea we will just take the thing apart and spend even more money to rebuild it with recycled material. In my opinion you all need to stop worrying about this and let the people putting all the time, and effort into building it, worry about it. You telling us that we cant get a permit because of treated wood really doesnt do sh*** for us. So unless one of you wants to help us try and get a permit, you should just close your mouths, unless asked to open them. |
I'll chime in since I am an investor on this project. I have been silent up until this point, but feel I should speak up. First off my intention to contribute financially was not so I could use the slider, I hardly kite at the sandbar. It was more for showing my support to the local kite community in Hood river. While I don't think it should be dismantled and built with the appropriate material, there should be options that can provide a solution for this current problem. Being someone with lack of experience with permit requirements and can't say I would have caught this as a problem intially, unless the permit explained it. I would think that if a permit was applied for, it would have been in our best interest to provide information to the permit office of our intentions of the design.
I appreciate the efforts put towards the construction and it looks like a very well constructed design. I just wish the process was communicated a little bit more detailed to at least those who supported it financially.
I can respect the frustration everyone is going through, just move on and try and resolve the issues so this can materialize soon.
stringy |
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 10:14 am |
|
|
Stringy,
nice post. I was also only trying to be helpfull in myown little sarcastic and self absorbed way.
The big thing with PT is abrasion. I would contact Jim since he is already working with DSL. Relationships are half the battle in the permit game.
You have to stress that it is temporary and that the PT wood will not be exposed to friction or other forces that would cause it to chip, crack or peel. You will probably want to show how it is going to be anchored, a simple deadman in the sand would likely work.
Cross your fingers and hope for the best.
Next time build it out of aluminum. stronger, lighter, probably cheaper these days, doesn't float, and non toxic.
|
|
|
EdG
Since 19 Dec 2005
424 Posts
Just a Kook that's
Obsessed
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 10:29 am |
|
|
I would be very hard to launch it on the sly with all the talk about it on a forum
I hope all goes well. I can't wait to photograph you guys on it since I don't have the balls to hit it |
|
|
pkh
Since 27 Feb 2005
6548 Posts
Couve / Hood
Site Lackey
|
Thu Jun 14, 07 10:36 am |
|
|
I think there's a polite/helpful way to go about making suggestions and a piss on the parade way. Please be considerate of the folks that are putting money and sweat equity into this project. You can use PM's and emails, everything doesn't need to be on the public forum. |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|